For the COO & Head of Claims · COO / Head of Claims

Cut claims cycle time and leakage without breaking customer trust.

You're measured on cycle time, indemnity leakage, adjuster productivity, and NPS — usually all four at once. FPTInsure ships claims AI that reads your files, triages FNOL, spots fraud, and hands the hard cases to your best adjusters faster.

What you're up against

The problems we hear from every COO / Head of Claims we talk to. If two of these match your week, keep reading.

FNOL bottlenecks

Peaks blow up cycle-time SLAs. Overtime spend rises, quality drops, and complaints follow.

Fraud caught too late

Investigators drown in low-signal referrals. Real fraud pays out before SIU gets there.

Adjusters buried in admin

60% of adjuster time is on documents and coordination, not the customer. Attrition follows.

Compliance risk from AI vendors

Every vendor promises AI. Very few can show you an EU AI Act technical file or a bias report your regulator will accept.

What good looks like

40–70%
FNOL triage cycle time reduction on carrier programmes
2–5×
SIU investigator precision @ same capacity
25–40%
Adjuster time returned to customer-facing work
0
Coverage decisions made by AI without a licensed human

Where we bet with you

The four moves that shift your metrics fastest — and where in our stack they live.

FNOL Triage & Severity

Classifies, scores severity, routes to fast-track or handler pod. Confidence < 0.75 auto-routes to human. Model card + fairness testing on every release.

See claims solutions

Fraud & SIU Signal

Explainable referral scores with SHAP-style contributing signals. The model never denies a claim — it prioritises where SIU spends time.

See Fraud solution

Adjuster Copilot

Document extraction, summary generation, coverage-check drafting. Grounded in your policy library, every claim shows sources.

See AI Factory

Voice & servicing (FPT.AI)

Inbound voice agent handles status checks, endorsements, callbacks. Warm-transfer on complaint keywords or vulnerable-customer signals.

See FPT.AI

Proof to send your team

Three links that get the rest of your organisation onside.

Case studies with claims metrics

Loss ratio, cycle time, leakage — with the numbers named.

Open →
Responsible AI

Model cards, HITL patterns, bias testing — everything your GC and CRO will ask for.

Open →
Insights

POVs on claims AI, fraud, and post-market monitoring.

Open →

What you'll be asked

The questions your peers, procurement, and board will fire back at you. Our answers.

Will AI make a bad coverage decision on my behalf?+

No. Every coverage decision, decline, and cancellation is a Gate pattern — human decides. AI proposes and cites sources; the licensed adjuster owns the call.

How fast does this actually move the loss ratio?+

Cycle time and leakage move first — quarters, not years. Loss ratio impact is programme-dependent; we scope it against your triangle data before we sign.

My adjusters don't trust AI. How do you land it?+

The adjuster is the user, not the target. Every model output shows its sources; every override is one click and audit-logged. Adjusters adopt tools that make them faster, not tools that grade them.

What if the model is wrong on a cohort?+

Quarterly fairness testing on stratified cohorts. Misses trigger a documented remediation workflow — not a silent override.

Two ways to take the next step.

Pick the one that fits where you are.

Claims cycle-time diagnostic

Send us anonymised FNOL data — we'll benchmark cycle time and leakage vs. peers.

Request diagnostic
Book a working session

60 minutes with an ex-adjuster and a claims AI lead.

Book a meeting