Submission Ingestion & Extraction
SOVs, loss runs, broker email threads → structured risk record with source citations on every field. Underwriter confirms before the file goes to quote.
See underwriting solutions →You need to see more submissions, quote faster, and hold the pen on selection. FPTInsure builds underwriting AI that reads submissions, structures exposures, surfaces appetite fit, and gives your underwriters back the hours they lose to admin.
The problems we hear from every Chief Underwriting Officer we talk to. If two of these match your week, keep reading.
Brokers send more than you can quote. The best risks age out; the worst ones consume your senior UWs.
SOVs, loss runs, and broker emails read differently every time. Your MI is only as good as the extraction.
Rules live in someone's head and a 2019 PDF. Junior underwriters bind risks the appetite doesn't want.
Rating feedback is quarterly, not daily. Portfolio drift is caught after it costs money.
The four moves that shift your metrics fastest — and where in our stack they live.
SOVs, loss runs, broker email threads → structured risk record with source citations on every field. Underwriter confirms before the file goes to quote.
See underwriting solutions →Real-time appetite check with the reasons attached. Referral flags before the underwriter opens the file, not after they've spent 40 minutes on it.
See AI Factory →Continuous drift detection, exposure summary, reserving triangulation. Actuarial and UW read the same numbers, daily.
See solutions catalog →Producer-facing assistant grounded in your appetite guide and rate book. Every answer cites the source doc; no hallucinated coverage.
See solutions →Three links that get the rest of your organisation onside.
The questions your peers, procurement, and board will fire back at you. Our answers.
It doesn't. The model produces a structured file with citations. Your underwriter reads, edits, decides. No auto-bind, ever.
Yes — that's the point. Extraction models are trained on real broker messiness (multiple templates, inline emails, scanned addenda). Every field cites its source page so your UWs can verify fast.
The AI is a copilot, not a rater. Rating factor changes still flow through your actuarial pricing pipeline. We just give your UWs more time to exercise judgement on the risks that need it.
Specialty is where we started. Submission depth and non-standard templates are the norm, not the exception. See the Reinsurance vertical.
Pick the one that fits where you are.
Share a redacted week of submissions — we'll benchmark extraction quality and time-to-quote.
Request diagnostic